top of page
Love And Sex With Robots




Emily Jaworski, MA

Graduate Institute of
Futures Studies
Simon Dubé

Dr. Simon Dubé

Kinsey Institute
Dr. David Levy

Dr. David Levy

Founder and author of 
Love & Sex with Robots
BOBBI Bidochka.jpg

Bobbi Bidochka, MA

Founder, imagine ideation

Dr. Kenneth Hanson

University of Wyoming


2022 David Levy Best Paper

RECIPIENT: Kenneth Hanson, PhD

ABSTRACT: In light of repeated calls for empirically driven analyses of sex doll and sex robot owners, I outline key methodological challenges for researchers in this field. I discuss how methodological limitations have shaped the field thus far and narrowed the scope of empirical research to date. To resolve these issues, I propose strategies for improving archival, quantitative, and qualitative approaches for future scholarship. Specifically, I attend to issues of historicity, nomenclature, population, sampling, qualitative approaches, and research ethics. I conclude with a discussion of the stigma associated with sex dolls, sex robots, and sex tech amplifies the need for researchers to respect and adhere to ethical research practices yet still maintain a critical distance that directly confronts, rather than skirts, dilemmas related to use and production. This methodological reckoning will help scholars design more robust studies and effectively evaluate innovations in the field. 

Ken Hanson.jpg
Screenshot 2023-02-18 at 9.09.40 AM.png

2022 Best Presentations

RECIPIENTS: Dr. Lara Karaian & Delphine DiTecco, PhD Candidate

ABSTRACT This paper examines the surveillance and municipal regulation of sex robot “brothels”. We begin by briefly mapping dollbot “brothel” controversies from across Europe and North America, noting the ways in which sex robots and their users are constructed as “profoundly offensive” thus necessitating more stringent municipal surveillance and sanction. We argue that this heightened sense of offense is fueled, in large part, by the construction of dollbots as sex “workers” who collectively hustle in public commercial spaces, rather than as sex toys or commodities that can be bought and/or rented in XXX stores. Drawing on sex robot, sex work, and legal scholarship, including Joel Feinberg’s The Moral Limits of the Criminal Law (1988) and his analysis of “Offence to Others,” we argue against offense, and suggest that defending public spaces where sex robots can be experienced and enjoyed offers an important queer legal intervention.  

RECIPIENT: Reggie Guzman

ABSTRACT Bringing an artificial companion into one's life is a life-changing experience. For me, it started as an experiment. There were many surprises I was not expecting. Having artificial companions has painted a clear picture of what I would like to see in my future. This presentation is about what led me to invite artificial companions into my life, how this has benefited me, and what I believe the future holds for us.


2022 Best Data Blitz

RECIPIENT: Madison Willians, BA Honors

ABSTRACT Sex robots remain scarce. Researchers must therefore rely on hypothetical, self-report questions to examine people’s attitudes toward such machines. These questions, however, have the potential to influence participants’ attitudes toward sex robots. Yet, little is known about how questionnaires may themselves influence responses toward these robots. Hence, this study assesses whether answering questions about sex robots affects participants’ willingness to engage erotically with them. Based on previous research, we hypothesized that, compared to their baseline, participants will be more willing to engage with sex robots after answering a survey about them.



2022 Best Rapid Talk

RECIPIENTS: Dr. Liesel Sharabi, Marco Dehnert PhD Candidate

ABSTRACT Artificial sex and love partners continue to be interesting and controversial topics for both lay and academic audiences. This study investigated the role of interactivity in encounters with embodied artificial sex partners such as sex robots and dolls. Complementing existing qualitative research on relationship formation between humans and artificial sex and love partners, this quantitative study focused on examining the impact of perceived interactivity on potential users’ perceptions of immersion into a human-robot/doll relationship—what has been described as sexual interaction illusion (Szczuka et al., 2019). Situated within the framework of human-machine and human-AI communication studies, this study contributes to the empirical investigation of human-robot/doll relationships alongside ethical, legal, and other approaches. The results of this study also offer an initial empirical test of the sexual interaction illusion model (Szczuka et al., 2019) in the context of human-machine relationships and illustrate that interactivity appears to be related to higher co-presence. This indicates that the design of artificial sex and love partners impacts sexual interaction illusion where more interactive technologies induce higher immersion and a sense of co-presence. This study’s findings should be interpreted in light of cultural stereotypes of sex dolls/robots gained through science-fiction, advertising, pornography, and so on. Nevertheless, these results complement existing empirical work and highlight the role of interactive technologies in human-machine relationships.

Sharabi_Headshot copy.jpg
Image by Vackground

HISTORY - David Levy

Love and Sex with Robots began to attract serious interest as an academic subject in 1983, when Dr. Neil Frude remarked in his book, The Intimate Machine, that:​“Computer technology offers new possibilities in sexual stimulation, and since pornography merchants have never been slow to exploit new techniques for their industry, we can anticipate that the new potential will be thoroughly explored.”

The year following Dr. Frude's publication saw the birth of another ground-breaking book – The Second Self, by Dr. Sherry Turkle, a professor at MIT.  Her research for that book was an investigation into the likely future effects of computers on society, on which she wrote:“We search for a link between who we are and what we have made, between who we are and what we might create, between who we are and what, through our intimacy with our own creations, we might become.”

In the book, Turkle quoted an MIT student, of whom she had asked how he felt about his computer. When I first read it, in 2003, that student’s reply hit me like a thunderbolt. He said that he had “tried having girlfriends but I prefer my relationship with my computer”. This quirky answer, dating as it did from the early 1980s, caused me to wonder to what extent such feelings existed two decades later, when computers were far more widespread than they had been in the early 80s. Had feelings of affection for computers become just as commonplace? Thus I was drawn to this challenging topic – intimate and loving relationships with robots.

My interest in this topic developed into a book, for which Love and Sex with Robots seemed like an ideal title. While I was in the process of researching and writing the book I discovered that a symposium on a new academic subject – Roboethics – had taken place in San Remo, Italy, in January 2004, and I was invited by those who had organized that symposium to speak at a follow-up conference – the EURON Roboethics “Atelier”, in Genoa, in February 2006.  There I gave three talks, all based on my research material which had yet to be published. And the following year I presented at the ICRA Workshop on Roboethics in Rome, which formed part of the IEEE-RAS International Conference on Robotics and Automation. By virtue of the IEEE hosting the Roboethics workshop and its constituent parts, our subject had truly arrived as an accepted discipline on the academic scene.

As my book Love and Sex with Robots neared completion, I was invited by the University of Maastricht to submit an academic version of my research as a PhD thesis, with the slightly more conservative title “Intimate Relationships with Artificial Partners”. On the day of my thesis defence there was a flurry of interest from the Dutch media, such a strong flurry that the university was happy to organize a conference the following year devoted entirely to the subject. As a result, for three years (2008, 2009 and 2010) the Netherlands played host to the International Conference on Human-Robot Personal Relationships, the proceedings of which were published by Springer. The kudos of having Springer publish those proceedings further enhanced the credentials of our subject as an academic discipline.

In 2011, I was contacted by Professor Adrian Cheok at the National University of Singapore, who invited me to act as external examiner for one of his PhD students, Hooman Samani, whose thesis, I felt, made a significant contribution to our nascent field. Partly because of Adrian’s own interest and research work in the field, we became good friends, we flew together to sightsee the Himalayas, including the top of Mount Everest, and in 2014, Adrian suggested that we start a new academic conference: The International Congress on Love and Sex with Robots.

Adrian’s suggestion came at the conclusion of a workshop, with that title, which took place at Goldsmiths University and was organized as part of the 50th anniversary celebrations of AISB – the UK’s leading artificial intelligence organization. The workshop was a success in terms of the number of attendees (around 40), and because it provided further endorsement by academia of Love and Sex with Robots as an appropriate academic research discipline. The first conference in this new series took place soon afterwards in Funchal, on the beautiful island of Madeira and organized by the University of Madeira.


For the following year, 2015, Adrian and I planned to hold the conference in Iskandar, at the southern tip of Malaysia where Adrian had been appointed Director of the Imagineering Institute, a newly created research establishment funded by the Malaysian government’s sovereign wealth fund. But about two weeks before the conference was due to begin, disaster struck. The Malaysian Minister for Tourism suddenly discovered that the conference was scheduled to take place in his country and immediately took against the idea on the grounds that it offended against Malaysian culture. The Kuala Lumpur Chief of Police, Tan Sri Khalid Abu Bakar, called a press conference where he described the event as “ridiculous”, adding that there is “nothing scientific about having sex with machines. It is not our culture. We can take action against the organizer if they choose to hold the event”. One of the journalists present at the press conference asked on what grounds Adrian and I could be arrested and charged if we went ahead with the event, and was told “Don’t worry. We will think of something.” Not wishing to offend Malaysia, and wishing even less to taste the food in a Malaysian jail, Adrian and I had no alternative but to postpone the second International Conference on Love and Sex with Robots to the following year.

Goldsmiths University in London proved an ideal venue for the second conference, and added yet further academic credentials to the series when the event took place in December 2016. All local arrangements were made by Dr. Kate Devlin, who subsequently authored the book Turned On: Science Sex and Robots.

The second conference was such a success that we initially decided to return to Goldsmiths for the third, in December 2017, but in the run-up to the event some credible intelligence reached the special branch of the police in Malaysia which caused us to change the venue for security reasons. Adrian is half-Greek, and was able at short notice to make suitable arrangements for the use of a hall and excellent catering facilities at the Greek Orthodox Church in Golders Green, north-west London. An innovation at the third conference was the inauguration of a “best paper” award in my name, which was presented to a Belgian PhD student.

The fourth conference had been due to take place in 2018 in Montana, but had to be postponed.  Fortunately a PhD Student so enjoyed the third conference that he very kindly offered to take on the organization of the postponed fourth in the series, which duly took place in Brussels at the beginning of July 2019. It was a brilliantly organized event, very much enjoyed by all who attended, and in my opinion the best in the series so far.

For the fifth in the series, we were in the process of discussing when and where it should be held, when the decisions were taken out of our hands by COVID-19. It was a case of “all hands on deck” to find a viable alternative, and in common with most other international conferences, we resolved to make that year’s event a virtual conference. Thanks to the efforts of Bobbi Bidochka, CEO of Imagine Ideation, and Dr. Simon Dubé, we successfully delivered the conference on Zoom from Montreal, and so we repeated the format last year and for this year's event.


So, the International Congress on Love and Sex with Robots is alive and well. The change to a virtual event has attracted significantly more registrations than we achieved in previous years.


Once again this year, there is the possibility of sharing science and research conducted all around the globe via asynchronous poster presentations, brief communications, and data blitzes.


Building on our successes of the past two years, the organizing committee is, more than ever, committed to delivering a world class virtual event, with the aim of continuously improving the quality of the LSR conference and organization.


Past Proceedings

LSR 2022: IOS Press, Journal of Future Robot Life Vol 3, Issue 2

LSR 2021: IOS Press, Journal of Future Robot Life Vol. 3, Issue 1

​LSR 2019: De Gruyter, Paladyn, Journal of Behavioral Robotics Vol. 11, Issue 1​

LSR 2017: Springer, Love and Sex with Robots LNCS, Vol. 10237​

LSR 2016: Springer, Love and Sex with Robots LNCS, Vol. 10715​

LSR 2014: ACM, ACE 2014 Workshops on Advances in Computer Entertainment Conference

Loe & Sex with Robots
Image by Efe Kurnaz

Visit our Youtube Channel for
Presentation Highlights

bottom of page